Sponsored Projects

Proposal Budget Basics

Proposals must include a budget, a detailed breakdown of the financial support requested from the sponsoring agency. (For NIH Modular Budgets, see the Sample NIH Modular Budget Template.) The budget should reflect the best estimate of the costs requested to conduct the work outlined in other sections of the proposal.


Most sponsors provide detailed instructions for budget preparation; many provide budget forms or require a specific format. Always read the agency guidelines before preparing a proposal budget.

Budgets for federal contracts and grants are to be prepared in accordance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-21, “Cost Principles for Educational Institutions.” OMB A-21 identifies allowable direct cost categories and prescribes a standard distribution and allocation method for the recovery of F&A costs. Because OMB A-21 also establishes standards for consistency in the treatment of costs for institutional accounting, the A-21 regulations apply to grants, contracts, and other types of awards accepted by the campus.

Budget Categories

Cost Categories

Proposal budgets generally include two basic categories of costs: direct costs of the proposed project and facilities and administrative (F&A or indirect) costs. Both are real costs. Direct costs plus F&A costs equal total costs.

Direct Costs

Direct costs are incurred in the performance of the project and must be directly attributable to the project and must be considered reasonable, allocable, and allowable. Direct costs include categories such as salaries, fringe benefits and vacation accrual, graduate student fees and tuition, consultant costs, equipment, supplies, travel, subagreements, alterations or renovations, and other costs.


Salaries and Wages

For each project participant, list the:

  • Name (or “To Be Named” for an unfilled position)
  • University payroll title
  • Nature of the position (e.g., nine month or 12 month appointment)
  • Current annual or monthly salary (summer salary for faculty with nine-month appointments should be listed as a separate line item)
  • Number of months per year and/or percentage of effort
  • Total salary requested

For multiple-year budgets, include:

  • Projected cost of living increases, specifying the period to which they apply, with an explanation of the basis for calculating the rates
  • Projected merit increases, specifying the period to which they apply, with an explanation of the basis for calculating the rates

Resources for Salaries and Wages

Fringe Benefits

Use the University’s DHHS-approved composite rates along with the projections provided.

Resources for Fringe Benefits

Vacation Accrual Time on Grants and Contracts

All UC Berkeley staff employees accrue vacation time in accordance with relevant personnel policies and labor contract provisions, including UC Berkeley staff employees paid on grants and contracts. Departments and research units should encourage staff supported by sponsored projects to use vacation time in accordance with their personnel program, percentage of appointment, and service. Vacation accrual costs should not be included on sponsored project budgets.

Resources for Vacation Accrual

Graduate Student Fees and Tuition

For proposal budgeting purposes graduate student fees and tuition may appear as a separate line under “Fringe Benefits.” It should clearly be labeled, and the cost should be explained in the budget justification. However, graduate student fees and tuition should not be combined with the composite fringes benefit rate. Graduate student fees and tuition are not subject to indirect cost (F&A).

Resources for Fees and Tuition

Consultant Costs

Consultant fees may generally be paid only to individuals not employed by the campus or other UC campuses or UC labs who can provide special knowledge or advice necessary for the project. For each individual, specify the name, daily rate of pay, and number of days each consultant will be paid. Documentation supporting the reasonableness of the pay rate should be provided. Any costs of travel and per diem should be specified. All consultant costs are subject to the applicable indirect cost rate associated with the sponsored agreement.

Resources for Consultant Costs


The University defines equipment as items that cost at least $5,000 and and have a life expectancy of at least one year. These items should be included as equipment in the budget and excluded from MTDC.

  • List each item individually and describe as completely as possible.
  • Provide current prices with sources noted. Original vendor pricing information should be retained.
  • Explain any inflationary factors that have been used to estimate anticipated increases.
  • If equipment is to be fabricated rather than purchased, itemize the individual component parts and estimated labor costs, explain the basis for calculations, and retain supporting documentation. If title of the fabricated equipment is retained by UC, no indirect cost applies but California taxes do; if title goes to the sponsor, then full indirect cost applies.

Resources for Equipment


Supplies are expendable items under $5,000, specifically related to the project.

The University threshold for equipment changed from $1,500 to $5,000 effective July 1, 2004. Items costing less than $5,000 should be included as supplies in the budget and included within the MTDC base.

  • List by specific categories of cost (e.g., chemicals, glassware, survey forms, small electronic components) with an estimate of the cost of each category.
  • Explain how estimates were derived. Historical costs can be the basis of budget estimates for ongoing projects or in cases where similar work has been performed on another project.

Resources for Supplies


Specify for each trip:

  • Purpose and destination (if known)
  • Number of individuals traveling
  • Mode and cost of transportation (e.g., airfare, mileage reimbursement)
  • Number of days of per diem and the per diem rate

Resources for Travel

Subagreements with Collaborators

Before a sponsor’s funds can flow from Berkeley to another entity, it is necessary to select the proper type of funding instrument to make this happen. The first step in this process is to determine what type of transaction the sponsor is using to provide funding to Berkeley. Two types of transactions are typically received by SPO: Awards and Contracts.

  • “Award” means financial assistance (grants, cooperative agreements) that provides support or stimulation to accomplish a public purpose.
  • “Contract” means a contractual agreement to procure goods and/or services for the direct benefit or use of the Sponsor.

Under an “Award” of financial assistance Berkeley may issue a “subaward” to any entity that is needed as a collaborator on the project. However, when Berkeley receives a “Contract” and wants to provide project funds to a collaborating entity the appropriate transaction is a “subcontract.” Note: Sponsor approval is assumed if a subawardee is named in the Berkeley proposal. Subcontracts may require additional prior written approval of the sponsor.

Each collaborating entity (subrecipient) should be named in the proposal. The proposal should incorporate documentation from each subrecipient, including a complete itemized budget, budget justification, Statement of Work to be performed, and a description of the subrecipient’s qualifications to perform that work. The proposal also should include a letter of commitment, a cover sheet, certification, and a Subrecipient Commitment Form signed by each subrecipient’s authorized official.

The costs of each subaward/subcontract should appear in Berkeley’s proposal budget as a separate line item that includes both the subrecipient’s direct and indirect costs. Berkeley’s negotiated indirect cost (F&A) rate should then be applied on only the first $25,000 of the total amount of the subaward/subcontract. Note: When a lesser F&A rate is all that the sponsor will allow, the lesser F&A rate is applied to “all” subaward/subcontractor costs. The following chart illustrates these relationships:

Type of Sponsorship Transaction Negotiated F&A Rate Lesser F&A Rate
Award Subaward Charged on first $25,000 Charged on all subaward costs
Contract Subcontract Charged on first $25,000 Charged on all subcontract costs

Collaborator vs. Vendor (Supplier)

When an entity does not contribute a significant portion to the project as described in the Statement of Work and is instead is providing goods and/or services that are ancillary to the operation of the sponsored program, a subaward or subcontract should not be used. Instead, the entity should be treated as a “vendor”.  At Berkeley vendors are referred to as “suppliers.” Suppliers should be contracted for their goods and/or services according to the procedures specified by Procurement Services.

To determine if an entity is a collaborator or a supplier use the following guide:

( ) Yes ( ) No  The goods and/or services to be provided are comparable to the goods and/or services the entity provides to many different customers during the course of normal business operations.

( ) Yes ( ) No  The goods and/or services to be provided will be supplementary to the operation of the sponsored program and the entity will not be responsible for programmatic decision making.

If the answer to either of these questions is “Yes,” the entity should be considered a supplier. Note: “Independent Contractors” are typically considered suppliers because their involvement in the project is short term and/or sporadic and the services they provide do not include programmatic decision making.

It is important to correctly categorize collaborators and suppliers at the proposal stage because, as noted above, indirect cost charges are applied to “all” supplier costs but only to the first $25,000 of a subaward or subcontract when Berkeley’s negotiated rate is applied. If an entity is incorrectly budgeted as a subawardee in the proposal and it becomes necessary to treat the entity as a supplier at the award stage, the PI may lack sufficient project funds to cover the indirect costs that will be charged. This can negatively impact project outcomes.

Furthermore, SPO must flow down all of the compliance requirements from the prime award or contract received by Berkeley, e.g., effort reporting on federal awards, to each subawardee or subcontractor. Suppliers are not subject to all of these compliance requirements and will be ill-prepared to comply with some requirements if they are incorrectly classified as a subrecipient.
Per UC Business and Finance Bulletin BUS-43, a “sole source justification” must accompany requests for contracts when competition is deemed unacceptable and the dollar amount will exceed $10,000. Additionally Procurement must conduct a competitive bidding process for those requests that exceed $50,000. However when an entity is a collaborating subawardee or subcontractor the foregoing is not required. Should a supplier be incorrectly classified as a subawardee or subcontractor and the sole source justification or competitive bidding process not be addressed, the use of the supplier could place Berkeley at risk for audit findings that could impact future funding from the sponsor.

“Named” vs. “TBD” Collaborators

When the name and/or role of another entity is still “TBD” (to be determined) at the proposal stage, it is safest to budget for this entity as though the entity will be a supplier. Include the total cost of the supplier’s goods in the budget under “supplies” or “equipment.” Supplier services should be budgeted under “contractual services” or “other.” The total cost of items budgeted as supplies, contractual services, or other will be subject to F&A charges. Items classified as equipment are not subject to F&A, unless a lesser indirect cost rate is used instead of the University’s negotiated F&A rate.

Note: If the unnamed entity is budgeted as a subrecipient at the proposal stage, and at the award stage a supplier relationship is determined to be more appropriate, it may be necessary for the PI to modify the proposal budget to include appropriate F&A charges.

Resources for Subagreements

Alterations and Renovations

Budgets may include essential alterations and renovations necessary to convert interior space necessary to adapt an existing facility or to install equipment. Routine maintenance and repair are generally not considered alteration and renovation expenses.

  • Specify the amount
  • Provide justification

Other Direct Costs

Use previous department and investigator experience when available. BAIRS reports can provide comparative data for estimates, and consult with faculty and staff colleagues for assistance. Always follow agency guidelines on direct costs in proposal budgets. Typical categories of other direct costs are listed below. On federally sponsored projects, clerical support, postage, local telephone costs, and memberships cannot be charged unless they are specifically approved by the agency.

  • Graduate student fee remission. Under MTDC, no indirect cost is applied.
  • Stipends. Stipend charges are allowable for projects with a training component and fellowships. For the Berkeley campus, all individual grants for student fellowships are considered a fellowship and have no indirect cost applied. All individual grants for postdoctoral or faculty fellowships from federal agencies are considered research funding, and the research indirect cost rate is applied.
  • Publication/documentation/dissemination costs. This category includes expenses for publication in established journals. Costs for publication of a book, monograph, or other publication usually cannot be charged without prior approval from the sponsor.
  • Meeting costs, participant costs.
  • Computer usage rates.
  • Allowable telecommunications charges.
  • Equipment maintenance. Charges should be based on maintenance agreements.
  • Equipment rental. Charges may be included as rental costs if the cost of equipment rental is required for the project.
  • Rental costs. When projects are conducted in rental space not owned by the University, the off-campus indirect cost rates apply, and the rental charges must appear on the proposal budget.
  • Service agreements. Service agreements generally result in delivery of a product and may be issued to either individuals or companies. They are sometimes included in the cost of equipment purchase.
  • General, Automobile, and Employment Liability (GAEL) charges.

Resources for Other Direct Costs

Indirect (Facilities and Administrative) Costs

Indirect (or facilities and administrative (F&A) or overhead) costs represent those expenses that cannot be easily identified to any specific project, but that are incurred for common or joint objectives. Indirect cost elements include items such as operation and maintenance of facilities, including building depreciation, library expenses, space, utilities, payroll, accounting, and other services. Different rates are applied to on and off campus research, instruction, and other activities.

The University’s standard indirect cost rates are negotiated with the federal government (UC Berkeley’s cognizant federal agency is the Department of Health and Human Services) and applied to all projects regardless of the sponsor, unless the UC Office of the President has approved an indirect cost waiver. Some sponsoring agencies do not reimburse indirect costs at the full rate. The University will honor these exceptions when the organization has written guidelines or will provide a letter stating agency policy on payment of indirect costs. The type of base and any cost items excluded from the base must be specified in either the written guidelines or sponsor letter.

To develop a budget that includes indirect costs, the allowed/approved indirect cost (F&A) rate is applied to a defined direct cost “base.” There are three possible base options:

The Modified Total Direct Cost (MTDC) base is used when the federally negotiated rates are applied. It is derived by excluding certain costs from the direct cost total. At Berkeley, MTDC excludes equipment and fabrication of equipment, capital expenditures, charges for patient care, tuition remission, rental costs of off-site facilities, scholarship, and fellowships, as well as the amount of each subaward over $25,000. Not all sponsoring agencies may apply all of these categories to the MTDC; check the specific agency guidelines for instructions on budget calculation.

The Total Direct Cost (TDC) base includes all of the direct costs being charged to the sponsor. Nothing is excluded from the base prior to calculating the indirect costs (F&A). This base is typically used when a sponsor declines to pay Berkeley’s federally approved indirect cost/F&A rate and an F&A waiver is granted by the University.

The Total Cost (TC) base is used when the sponsor states that only a certain percentage of Total Project Costs can be charged for indirect (F&A) costs.

The following three examples are provided to illustrate how different indirect cost bases affect project costs.

MTDC Base. In Case #1 below, the University is allowed to charge the federally negotiated on-campus rate for organized research. Direct costs total $100,000, and $10,000 of this amount is for equipment (an item excluded from MTDC under Berkeley’s F&A agreement with DHHS).

Case #1 MTDC Base
Personnel Costs $90,000
Equipment $10,000
Total $100,000
MTDC $90,000
(less equipment)
F&A rate (56.5% x MTDC) $50,850
Total Request $150,850

TDC Base. In Case #2 below, the University is prohibited by official sponsor policy from charging the federally negotiated on-campus rate for organized research. The sponsor allows a rate of 10%. As in Case # 1 direct costs total $100,000, and $10,000 of this amount is for equipment.

Case #2 TDC Base
Personnel Costs $90,000
Equipment $10,000
Total $100,000
TDC $100,000
(equipment included)
F&A rate (10% x TDC) $10,000
Total Request $110,000

TC Base. In Case #3, the sponsor has indicated that no more than 10% of the Total Costs (the total amount requested) can be used for F&A. Unlike Case #2 above, it is not appropriate to simply multiply 10% against the Total Direct Cost base because in Case #2 the F&A ($10,000) is actually only 9% of the Total Costs (10,000 / 110,000 = .09). For such cases you will need to know both the maximum amount of F&A that can be charged as well as the “actual” F&A rate being used.

Determining the Maximum Amount of F&A to Charge

  • Step 1: Deduct the allowed F&A percentage from 100% (e.g., 100% - 10% = 90%).
  • Step 2: Divide the amount of Total Direct Costs in the budget by this percentage to obtain Total Costs (e.g., $100,000 / .90 = $111,111).
  • Step 3: Multiply the Total Costs obtained by the percentage for F&A allowed by the sponsor. This will generate the maximum allowed F&A (e.g., $111,111 * .10 = $1,111).
  • Step 4: Check the calculation. The Total Costs minus the Total Direct Costs should equal the amount of the F&A charged to the sponsor (e.g., $111,111 - $100,000 = $1,111).

This scenario is illustrated below:

Case #3 TC Base
Personnel Costs $90,000
Equipment $10,000
Total Direct Costs (TDC) $100,000
Total Cost (TC)
($100,000 / .90)
F&A rate (10% of TC)
(.10 x $111,111)
($111,111 - $100,000) $1,111

Determining the Actual F&A Rate Used

Using the information provided above: 

  • Step 1: Identify the sponsor’s allowed F&A percentage of Total Costs (e.g., 10%).
  • Step 2: Deduct the allowed F&A percentage from 100% (e.g., 100% - 10% = 90%).
  • Step 3: Divide Step 1 by Step 2 for the “actual” indirect cost rate being used. (e.g., 10% / 90% = .1111 = 11.11%).

Resources for Indirect Costs

Cost Sharing and Matching Funds

Some funding agencies require the grantee institution to demonstrate its financial commitment to the project, or the commitment of other funding sources, by sharing the project costs.

Cost sharing should be included in the proposal only when the sponsor requires cost sharing as a condition of applying for an award. Cost sharing must be documented in the same way as other charges. Unfulfilled cost sharing commitments or lack of documentation may result in a reduction of costs allowed against the sponsored project and a return of funds to the agency.

Note: By using language in proposals that cites percentage of time, salaries, or specific levels of support, principal investigators can commit to cost sharing, even unintentionally. Any quantifiable cost offered in the proposal becomes a legally binding and accountable commitment of the Universiity upon award. For more information and for examples of language that may be used to address the issue of academic or programmatic contributions or support without creating a contractual and auditable commitment to cost sharing, see Cost Sharing Basics.

Cost sharing funds may come from an outside source in the form of cash contributions, volunteer services, or donated property; from the University’s own funds (e.g., personnel effort without salary recovery); or from shared resources or facilities. If the award is federal, only acceptable non-federal costs qualify as cost sharing.

Types of cost sharing

  • Direct-Cost: Direct-cost cost sharing is the provision of faculty and staff time and related fringe benefits, dedicated equipment, tuition, computer support, and other resources as direct support for the project, as well as related indirect costs. Commitments made by departments, schools, or other units must be detailed in the proposal and appropriate approvals must be included.
  • Indirect (F&A) Cost: This type of cost sharing occurs any time the University agrees to recover less than the federally negotiated indirect cost rate. Approval from the UC Office of the President is required if an indirect cost rate is lower than the university applied rate.

Matching funds, if required by the funding agency, are raised from non-federal outside sources to increase the level of support provided by the funding agency. Such funds must be identified by the donor or funding source for use as matching funds.

Always follow agency guidelines when preparing budgets with cost sharing or matching funds; formats vary by sponsor. The simplest version of a cost-sharing budget has three columns: amount requested from sponsor, UC contribution amount, and total project costs (the sum of the first two columns).

Resources for Cost Sharing

Budget Justification

The budget justification provides the rationale for proposed expenditures. The primary purpose of a justification is to provide support for the funds requested to ensure adequate funding. Follow agency guidelines to prepare budget justifications; requirements for the amount of documentation to support proposed costs and the detail of cost descriptions vary by sponsor.

Major items to include in budget justifications:

  • Salaries for faculty, research associates, graduate students, technicians, or staff
  • Permanent equipment
  • Large or unusual categories of supplies
  • Foreign travel and extensive domestic travel
  • Use of consultants (e.g., why the expertise is not available in-house, unique qualifications of individuals)
  • Subagreement costs
  • Construction
  • Any special items not easily justified by the nature of the proposal as a whole

Sample Budgets

Sample NSF Budget

This sample budget for a National Science Foundation proposal includes related UC and NSF guidance for each budget section. Please note that this is provided as an example only and should not be used to prepare an actual budget. (Prepared by Nora Watanabe in the Vice Chancellor for Research Office.)

Sample NIH Modular Budget Template

This NIH modular budget template should be provided for SPO review instead of a detailed line item budget. It may be used for budgets that include no more than $250,000 per year direct costs over a period of five years.