| This guidance
is provided to assist deans, directors, and department chairs in review
of proposals for extramurally sponsored grants, contracts, and other agreements
and to explain the purpose of their signature approving such proposals.
By reviewing
an extramural proposal and signing the accompanying Proposal
Review Form (PRF), the dean, director, or department chair certifies
that the arrangements proposed are compatible with the activities and
resources of the unit and school or college, and also authorizes acceptance,
within University policies, of an award that may result from the proposal.
Review of
extramural proposals should cover all areas of University activities affected
by a proposed project. The questions below are exemplary but not inclusive
of those to be considered in each particular case.
These responsibilites
are not to be delegated to staff. If the dean, director, or department
chair is unavailable to review and approve proposals, another academic
member of the unit should be delegated to do so.
If the dean,
director, or department chair has a personal financial interest in the
proposed sponsor of a project, someone else with appropriate authority
must review the proposal and sign the PRF.
Financial
Resources
Are the resources required to carry out the project currently available?
Are there cost sharing or matching requirements? If so, are those resources
available for commitment to that purpose? If two or more units are involved,
are the cost sharing responsibilities of each clearly understood?
Space
Is the space needed for the project adequate and available for the full
project period? If additional space or facilities will be required, have
appropriate commitments been made to assure their availability for the
project? Have the deans and chairs of other involved units been consulted?
Faculty
and Staff Time
Are
the time commitments proposed by the faculty reasonable to achieve the
goals of the project in light of teaching and other University responsibilities?
Is release time likely to be required? If so, can it be approved? Will
the principal investigator/project director and other key personnel be
available throughout the proposed term of the project? If the project
involves staff employees, are they available and properly funded for the
entire project period?
P.I.
Status
If the principal investigator or project director will lead the project
on an 'exceptional' basis, has the P.I. exception been established
for this particular project? Will extension of an existing approval period
be necessary? Are such arrangements already made or in progress?
Appropriateness
Is the proposed project acceptable under the principles of University
Regulation 4 regarding faculty salaries and investigations of a purely
commercial nature? Is the proposed project appropriate for the principal
investigator/project director(s), the administering unit, and the campus
to undertake? Does it serve the University missions of expanding knowledge
and educating students? Is there significant graduate student involvement?
If not, why? If the project involves other units on campus, have the chairs
and deans of those units been consulted?
For assistance
in evaluating administrative commitments in proposals, please contact
appropriate Sponsored
Projects Office staff.
|